Virginia Communication and Literacy Assessment (VCLA) Practice Test

The term that refers to assuming the truth of what one is trying to prove is called "begging the question." This rhetorical fallacy occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion instead of supporting it. Essentially, it involves circular reasoning where a statement or claim is taken for granted without evidence.

For instance, if someone argues that "reading is essential for success because it is vital," they are using the premise that reading is essential as proof of its necessity, without providing an independent justification for why reading leads to success. This highlights a logical flaw, as the conclusion is dependent on a premise that was never substantiated.

Understanding this term is important in both writing and critical thinking, as it helps to recognize weak arguments and to construct more coherent and evidence-based reasoning. In contrast, the other terms listed refer to different types of fallacies and tactics that do not involve the same circular reasoning aspect as begging the question.